Guides / Templates and checklists / Decision record

Decision record

If the call is not written down, the meeting never happened.


A decision record holds the recommendation, who could veto it, what evidence it rests on, and when it gets rechecked, versioned, so reversals show their working too. Part of our guide on templates and checklists.

Published: 16 September 2026 · By Andre · Reviewed by Bill · selrob

Takeaways

  • One record per decision: recommendation, veto holders, exceptions, evidence, recheck date.
  • Versions, not edits: a reversed call gets a new version with its reason; history stays readable.
  • Authority sits with who owns the call; facilitation with the meeting. This page is the paper.

When do you use it?

At the gate, every gate: week-one qualification, pricing requalification, and any reversal in between. The meeting produces the discussion; this record produces the decision a partner who was not in the room can read. Start it in the meeting, finish it the same day; a record completed a week later is reconstruction, not evidence.

What goes in each field?

  • Version. Number and date. Version 1 is the first call; reversals increment, never overwrite.
  • Opportunity. Buyer, title, value band, close date: enough to file it.
  • Recommendation. Bid, no-bid, or review: one word, then the sentence behind it.
  • Recommended by. The person accountable for the recommendation, per the authority model.
  • Veto holders. Who could stop it: delivery, finance, managing director, and whether each cleared, blocked, or abstained.
  • Exceptions. Departures, qualifications, and conditions attached, each with an owner.
  • Evidence. Clauses, criteria, capacity facts, and numbers the call rests on: pointers, not prose.
  • Recheck. Date and trigger for the next look: pricing, shortlisting, or a named event.

Blank template

Blank decision record

BID/NO-BID DECISION RECORD v__ (__/__/____)

Opportunity: [buyer / title / value band / close date]
Recommendation: [BID / NO-BID / REVIEW]: [one sentence]
Recommended by: [name, role]

Veto holders: delivery [cleared / blocked / abstained]; finance [cleared / blocked / abstained]; MD [cleared / blocked / abstained]

Exceptions and conditions: [departure or qualification / owner / due date]

Evidence: [clause / criterion / capacity fact / source location]

Recheck: [date] on [trigger: pricing, shortlist, named event]

Version 1.0, September 2026. Scope: one record per decision, per gate. Authority: the firm’s model, not this template.

Worked example

Completed example: one bid, one reversal

Hypothetical. The buyer, tender and figures are invented to show the fields in use; they are not a client result.

BID/NO-BID DECISION RECORD v1 (09/09/2026)

Opportunity: Example Water (state) / telemetry maintenance panel / $400k p.a. / closes 10/10/2026
Recommendation: BID: Panel seat fits strategy; two call-off types evidenced; delivery overlap confirmed.
Recommended by: Priya (BD lead)

Veto holders: delivery cleared; finance cleared; MD cleared

Exceptions and conditions: insurance tower to $20m required at mobilisation / broker binder due 25/09 / Elena

Evidence: panel conditions ยง4 (eligibility held); rate schedule vs delivery cost model v3; depot overlap map

Recheck: 30/09/2026 on pricing lock

v2 (30/09/2026) REVISED to CONDITIONAL BID: buyer addendum 03 moved call-off allocation to rotation; expected share halved. Finance re-cleared conditionally on rotation maths; recheck on first call-off invitation.

What does this mean for the bid/no-bid call?

The record is the call made durable: versioned, vetoed, evidenced, and rechecked. A gate without one degrades into memory within a fortnight, and memory always favours the hours already spent. When pricing changes the facts, the second gate gets its own version: re-qualifying at pricing.

Keep reading

Elsewhere in this guide.

Book a call

Bring the last tender you regretted.

In 30 minutes we’ll show you the call selrob would have made, and the working behind it.