Guides / Bid/no-bid / Who owns the call

Governance

The bid writer cannot own the bid/no-bid call.


The bid/no-bid decision guide only works if the wrong person is not holding the pen. Business development owns the recommendation. Delivery, finance and the managing director can stop it. The person who will write the response is the last owner you want.

Published: 2 September 2026 · By Andre · Reviewed by Bill · selrob

Takeaways

  • BD recommends. Delivery, finance and the MD each hold a veto on their axis.
  • The bid writer prepares the pack for the gate. They do not vote.
  • A twenty-minute weekly gate. Named axes, named owner, named date.
  • Qualification is not a replacement for the writer. It is how the writer gets the week back.

Why the bid writer cannot own it

Because their incentives point the wrong way. A writer measured on submissions submitted will submit. A writer who has already opened the template will defend the hours already spent. That is the zombie bid, and it starts with ownership, not with optimism.

The writer’s craft is the response. Asking them to also be the gate is how firms end up with beautifully written no-hopers. Give them the call after it is made. Not before.

Who holds which axis

Business development: recommends. They see the inbound first. They know the buyer. Their job is to bring a scored recommendation to the gate, not a story. If BD only ever recommends yes, the gate is theatre.

Delivery: capacity veto. They name the lead, the roster, and the work that moves if this is won. A delivery lead who is never in the room is how firms win work they cannot staff.

Finance: risk veto. Caps, insurance, payment, the size of a loss. Finance does not need to attend every gate. They need to have read the three clauses that matter, or to have said they have not, which is a review, not a yes.

Managing director: strategy veto. Used rarely, held always. The MD’s job is to stop the firm becoming a collection of whatever arrived this month. If the strategy sentence is not written down, this veto has nothing to stand on.

A RACI that fits on one page

Responsible: BD, for the recommendation and the scorecard. Accountable: the MD, for the call as recorded. Consulted: delivery and finance, on their axes. Informed: the bid writer, with a yes, a no, or a review ticket.

The 12 questions are what BD fills. The vetoes are what the others exercise. If consulted people start rewriting the recommendation in the meeting, the RACI has already failed.

How to run a twenty-minute gate

One inbound at a time. Scorecard on the table, not a slide. BD has three minutes. Delivery has three. Finance has three if a clause is in play. The MD speaks last, or not at all. The call is written before anyone stands up: bid, no-bid, or review with an owner and a day.

No drafting. No “let’s just start a response while we wait.” Starting is bidding. If the pack is incomplete, the call is review, not a quiet yes. Decline letters, when the call is no, are BD’s job; see how to say no-bid.

Is this replacing my job?

No. A qualification layer exists so the writer spends the week on work the firm has already chosen. The judgement that makes a response worth reading is still human. What leaves is the week spent proving, in prose, a case the gate would have killed on Tuesday.

Pursuit decisions belong with the team doing the work and the leaders accountable for the strategy. The writer is on that team. They are not the whole of it.

Keep reading

Elsewhere in this guide.

Questions

Worth answering before you close the tab.

Who should own the bid/no-bid decision?

BD owns the recommendation. Delivery vetoes capacity, finance vetoes risk, the MD vetoes strategy. The bid writer does not own it.

Does a qualification tool replace the bid writer?

No. It stops the bid writer spending a week on work the firm had already decided not to want. The writing still needs a writer.

How long should the gate meeting be?

Twenty minutes, once a week. Longer than that and it has become a drafting session.

Book a call

Bring the last tender you regretted.

In 30 minutes we’ll show you the call selrob would have made, and the working behind it.