Guides / Templates and checklists / Lessons learned

Lessons learned

Bid lessons-learned template for wins and losses.


Record what you can prove after a win or a loss, separate it from the story the room wants to tell, and assign one correction with a later check. Part of our guide on templates and checklists.

Published: 16 September 2026 · By Andre · Reviewed by Bill · selrob

Takeaways

  • An award notice is not a cause. Write the observation and its source before anyone explains why you won or lost.
  • Mark fact against inference. Competing explanations stay on the page until evidence picks one.
  • One owned action beats a list of wishes. Diary a follow-up to see whether the action changed the next gate.

When do you use it?

Fill a row within a week of award or decline, while the pack and the timesheet are still in reach. Use a debrief when you can get one; use the debrief request letter to ask. Do not wait for a quarterly wash-up. By then the firm has already invented a reason.

The template is a decision record, not a post-mortem theatre. It does not replace cost per win. Cost tells you what the period cost. This page tells you which process step you will change, and who will check that the change held.

What goes in each field?

  • Observation. A sentence a stranger could verify. Scores, a missed mandatory, hours spent, a clause that survived to submission. Not “the buyer wanted the incumbent.”
  • Source. Debrief notes, evaluation scores you were given, the lodgement receipt, the timesheet, the pack clause. If there is no source, the row is not ready.
  • Fact or inference. Fact is what the document or the debrief said. Inference is the explanation you are adding. Keep both; do not collapse them.
  • Process stage. Qualification, reading, writing, pricing, review, lodgement, or delivery handover. The stage names the next owner.
  • Proposed correction. One change to a rule, a checklist, a roster, or a gate question. Not “try harder.”
  • Owner. A named person who can make the correction without a further meeting.
  • Due date. When the correction is in force, not when someone will think about it.
  • Follow-up. The date and test that shows whether the action helped. Empty follow-up means the lesson was a speech.

Blank template

Blank lessons-learned register

Bid lessons-learned template for wins and losses, blank form
Observation Source Fact or inference Process stage Proposed correction Owner Due date Follow-up
    Fact Qualification        
    Inference Reading        

Version 1.0, September 2026. Scope: wins and losses on public and private tenders. Not a complaint file and not a claim about buyer intent.

Worked example

Completed example: one loss, one win

Hypothetical. The buyer, tender and figures are invented to show the fields in use; they are not a client result. No buyer quotes are invented.

Bid lessons-learned template for wins and losses, completed hypothetical example
Observation Source Fact or inference Process stage Proposed correction Owner Due date Follow-up
Loss. Methodology scored 6/10 against a 30% weighting; price was inside 3% of the awarded offer. Written debrief, 3 Nov 2026; evaluation table in RFT Part C Fact Writing Do not bid this buyer’s methodology-weighted RFTs until two comparable project write-ups exist in the library. Priya (BD) 17 Nov 2026 Check the next like-for-like inbound: if methodology evidence is still thin, the gate is no-bid. 15 Jan 2027.
The room said the incumbent was always going to win. Internal wash-up notes, 4 Nov 2026. Debrief did not name an incumbent advantage. Inference Qualification Keep the incumbent hypothesis as unproven. Do not use it to skip the next debrief. Priya (BD) 4 Nov 2026 If the next debrief still has no incumbent evidence, drop the story. 15 Jan 2027.
Win. ISO 27001 was held at close; two competitors were set aside at the mandatory gate (buyer said so in the debrief). Oral debrief, 12 Aug 2026; certificate schedule on file Fact Qualification Treat current ISO 27001 as a held mandatory, not a writing task, on the next information-security RFT. Sarah (CISO) Already held Confirm the certificate still covers the delivery scope before the next close. 1 Feb 2027.
Win. Pursuit ran 62 hours against a 40-hour budget. Timesheet export, 11 Aug 2026 Fact Qualification The next similar pack gets a 60-hour budget or a no-bid. Do not reuse the 40-hour default. Andre (commercial) 25 Aug 2026 Compare planned vs actual hours on the next two RFTs of this type. 31 Mar 2027.

What does this mean for the bid/no-bid call?

A lesson that cannot change the next gate is a story. If the observation is an unmet mandatory you already knew on day one, the correction is the week-one read, not a better draft. If the observation is a weighted criterion you cannot evidence, the correction is a no-bid rule for that buyer until the evidence exists. Assign one of those. Then look again on the follow-up date.

Keep reading

Elsewhere in this guide.

Book a call

Bring the last tender you regretted.

In 30 minutes we’ll show you the call selrob would have made, and the working behind it.