Guides / Templates and checklists / Clarification questions

Clarification questions

Tender clarification question template and question log.


A well-drafted clarification question resolves ambiguities in tender specifications or draft contracts without revealing your commercial strategy to competitors or triggering a defensive buyer response. Part of our guide on templates and checklists.

Published: 16 September 2026 · By Andre · Reviewed by Bill · selrob

Takeaways

  • Draft with neutral, objective precision: frame questions around conflicting pack documents or missing definitions rather than proposing your preferred commercial solution.
  • Protect your competitive advantage: never disclose proprietary pricing mechanisms, partner names, or staffing models in a public clarification forum.
  • Maintain a central clarification log: track submission dates, buyer deadlines, addenda references, and direct impacts on your compliance matrix and cost models.

When do you use it?

Use clarification questions as soon as an ambiguity, contradiction, or missing document is identified during initial tender reading. Under public sector probity rules, buyers distribute all questions and answers anonymously to every registered tenderer. As explained in our guide on tender addenda and clarifications, the timing of your submission matters: ask too early and you alert rivals to opportunities in the text; ask too late and you miss the clarification cut-off date (typically 5 to 10 business days before tender close). Answers received must immediately be reconciled against your compliance matrix.

What goes in each field?

  • Question ID. Sequential internal reference (e.g. CQ-01, CQ-02) matching your matrix cross-references.
  • Tender Document & Clause. Exact schedule, section, and page reference in the buyer's documentation pack.
  • Ambiguity Category. Scope conflict, specification gap, contradictory contract term, or pricing schedule formatting error.
  • Submitted Phrasing. The neutral, factual question submitted to the designated Contact Officer.
  • Date Submitted & Channel. Submission timestamp and method (e.g. AusTender portal, secure mailbox).
  • Clarification Cut-Off. The buyer's stated deadline for submitting questions.
  • Buyer Response & Addendum. Verbatim excerpt of the buyer's response and the corresponding published addendum reference.
  • Pursuit Impact. Operational decision triggered: update compliance status, amend pricing formula, or trigger a no-bid review.

Three reusable question framing patterns

When submitting clarification requests, avoid subjective questions such as “Can we use our proprietary framework instead?” Instead, adopt one of three neutral drafting patterns:

  • Pattern 1: Resolving document conflicts. “Clause 4.2 of Schedule B specifies a 30-day transition window, whereas Section 1.3 of the Draft Contract references a 60-day mobilization period. Could the Principal please confirm which timeframe takes precedence for pricing purposes?”
  • Pattern 2: Clarifying ambiguous scope boundaries. “In Section 3.1 ‘Deliverables’, item 4 requests ‘comprehensive data migration’. Could the Principal please clarify whether historical records prior to July 2023 fall within the scope of this procurement, or if migration is limited to active operational datasets?”
  • Pattern 3: Correcting pricing schedule formulas. “In Schedule 5 (Pricing Schedule), cell G14 appears to omit sub-line items 3a through 3c from the total calculation. Could the Principal please confirm whether an amended pricing workbook will be issued via addendum?”

Blank template

Blank tender clarification question log (8 fields)

Tender clarification question template and question log, blank form
Question ID Document & Clause Ambiguity Category Submitted Phrasing Date & Channel Cut-Off Date Buyer Response & Addendum Pursuit Impact
CQ-01 RFT Part B §4.2 Scope Ambiguity       Pending  
CQ-02 Contract §12.1 Contract Term Conflict       Pending  
CQ-03 Schedule 4 Pricing Schedule Error       Pending  

Version 1.0, September 2026. Scope: Public and private tender clarification management.

Worked example

Completed example: State infrastructure technical advisory RFP

Hypothetical. The buyer, tender and figures are invented to show the fields in use; they are not a client result.

Tender clarification question template and question log, completed hypothetical example
Question ID Document & Clause Ambiguity Category Submitted Phrasing Date & Channel Cut-Off Date Buyer Response & Addendum Pursuit Impact
CQ-01 Schedule 2 §3.1 Scope Ambiguity “Could the Principal confirm whether geotechnical site inspections are required across all 12 regional substations or only the 4 primary substations listed in Appendix C?” 12 Oct 2026 (Portal) 24 Oct 2026 “Inspections are required for all 12 substations. Revised Appendix C issued in Addendum 01.” Increased subcontractor travel budget by $32k; confirmed delivery capacity with regional partner.
CQ-02 Contract §19.4 Liability Conflict “Clause 19.4 references an uncapped supplier indemnity for third-party property damage, whereas Schedule 1 caps total contract liability at 200% of fees. Could the Principal clarify whether Clause 19.4 is subject to the Schedule 1 liability cap?” 14 Oct 2026 (Portal) 24 Oct 2026 “Third-party property indemnities remain subject to the Schedule 1 aggregate liability cap. Formal wording amendment in Addendum 02.” Removed legal veto; risk status upgraded from red to acceptable. Maintained pursuit.
CQ-03 Pricing Schedule 3 Pricing Discrepancy “Pricing Schedule 3 requests daily professional rates based on an 8-hour day, whereas Section 4.2 states service hours are 7.5 hours per day. Please clarify which hour basis applies.” 16 Oct 2026 (Email) 24 Oct 2026 “Tenderers should base daily rates on a standard 7.5-hour day. Updated Excel schedule issued.” Updated internal financial model rate cards prior to final commercial review.

What does this mean for the bid/no-bid call?

Clarification answers provide hard evidence that should directly influence your bid qualification. If a buyer's response confirms that an aggressive, uninsurable liability requirement is deliberate and non-negotiable, you have documented proof to walk away immediately. Similarly, if the buyer confirms that an incumbent’s legacy proprietary tool is mandatory for ongoing support, it signals an uncompetitive playing field. Requalify the bid the day addenda responses are released; do not wait until submission eve to discover an impasse.

Keep reading

Elsewhere in this guide.

Book a call

Bring the last tender you regretted.

In 30 minutes we’ll show you the call selrob would have made, and the working behind it.