Guides / Software / Data handling

Data handling

No country-wide hosting rule exists. Check the tender, the tool, and the contract.


Whether a tender pack may go through an AI tool depends on applicable privacy law, the buyer’s terms, the service tier’s hosting and processing, who can access the data, and subcontractors, per tender, per tool. Nothing here assumes a hosting mandate. Part of our guide on bid and tender software.

Published: 16 September 2026 · By Bill · Reviewed by Andre · selrob

Takeaways

  • Buyer terms govern first: confidentiality and handling clauses decide before any law is consulted.
  • Service tier matters more than vendor name: training opt-outs, retention, and regions vary by tier.
  • Verify against the actual contract and tier documentation, dated, never against a remembered summary.

What do you check, in what order?

  • Buyer terms. Confidentiality, handling, and disclosure clauses in the pack: what may leave your systems, to where, under what protections.
  • Applicable law. Privacy and data-protection obligations in the relevant jurisdiction (Australia’s Privacy Act and APPs, New Zealand’s Privacy Act, the UK GDPR regime) applied to this data, not recited in general.
  • Hosting and processing. Where the specific service tier stores and processes content, from that tier’s current documentation, with a verification date.
  • Training and retention. Whether inputs train models, how long content is retained, and what the opt-outs actually cover at your tier.
  • Access and subcontractors. Who at the vendor and its subprocessors can see content, named in the terms, not assumed from the brand.
  • Contract. Your service agreement and any data-processing addendum: the tier you pay for, not the tier you read about.

General confidentiality groundwork is on security and confidentiality; this page is the per-tender, per-tool check sequence across the three jurisdictions. UK security-evidence specifics sit with Cyber Essentials and ISO 27001.

What must you never assume?

A country-wide hosting mandate: none is assumed anywhere on this page, because the answer is pack-plus-tier specific. That a consumer chatbot tier and an enterprise tier handle data identically; they do not. That “we already use this vendor” covers a new pack with stricter handling clauses; each tender re-opens the question. Untested status is stated where nothing was tested: documentation review is not hands-on verification, and this page claims no testing of any vendor’s current tier.

What does this mean for the bid/no-bid call?

A pack whose handling clauses forbid the tooling your process depends on is a process fail in week one; re-plan the assessment method or no-bid. Build the check into the gate for every AI-assisted pursuit: buyer terms, law, tier, retention, access, contract: dated, filed, repeatable. Portability and exit (getting decisions and content back out) is a later page; design for export regardless.

Keep reading

Elsewhere in this guide.

Book a call

Bring the last tender you regretted.

In 30 minutes we’ll show you the call selrob would have made, and the working behind it.