Guides / Software / Buyer’s guide

Buyer’s guide

Ask a bid-tech vendor the way you would ask a supplier. Including us.


Evaluating bid technology requires asking vendors precise questions about data residency, model training rights, qualification methodology, and exportable decision records. Before purchasing tender tools, verify whether the software actually evaluates pursuit fit or simply speeds up draft generation. Part of our guide on bid and tender software; see also our comparison of qualification software and qualification vs response layers.

Published: 2 September 2026 · By Bill · Reviewed by Andre · selrob

Takeaways

  • Which layer: qualify, write, or find.
  • Does the call cite clauses, against your firm.
  • Where the pack lives, who trains, whether you can export the working.
  • What week one looks like if you do not buy.

Why ten questions, not a scorecard of vendors?

Because a ranking we invented would be an advert. Because procurement-literate buyers already know how to evaluate a supplier. Bid-tech vendors talk about tenders all day. That is not a reason to skip the evaluation. It is a reason to run it.

Send the list. Including to us. If a vendor cannot answer which layer they sit in, you already have the answer.

The ten

1. Which layer? Qualify, write, or find. Mixing the label is how firms buy a library to stop regretted bids.

2. Does the call cite clauses? A score without a page is a vibe. 3. Against our firm, or a generic model? Fit is not a benchmark. 4. Where does the pack live, and who trains on it? See confidentiality.

5. Australian data residency? Ask it as a fact, not a vibe. 6. Can we export the working? A call that dies in the vendor’s UI is not a gate a partner can sign. 7. What happens when the model is wrong? Override, visible, owned.

8. Seat versus evaluation pricing? Writing tools price seats. Qualification should price the gate. 9. Can the bid writer override the call? If yes, is that override visible to the people who own the axes. 10. What does week one look like without you? If the honest answer is a spreadsheet and a named slot, start there.

What selrob would answer

Qualification. The call cites clauses, scored on strategy, capacity and risk against your firm. The pack is the job, not a training set you did not agree to. Export the working. A writer can disagree; the disagreement should be visible. Week one without us is the scorecard and a twenty-minute slot. The software exists because that slot is the thing teams skip.

Plans are covered on a call. This page is the questions, not a checkout.

What a bad answer looks like

We do all three layers. We cannot show the clause. We score against best practice. We train on customer documents unless you opt out in a setting nobody finds. Week one without us is slower writing. Those answers are information. Believe them.

Buy the failing layer. Empty inbox: discovery, free first. No dated no-bids: qualification. Slow yeses on work that fits: response. Do not buy all three in one quarter.

Keep reading

Elsewhere in this guide.

Questions

Worth answering before you close the tab.

What should you ask a bid software vendor?

Which layer, whether the call cites clauses, where the pack lives, whether you can export the working, and what week one looks like without them. Including us.

Should the bid writer be able to override the call?

They will have a view. The override should be visible to the people who own the axes. A silent override is how the gate becomes optional.

Is this list only for selrob?

No. Send it to Loopio, Responsive, AutogenAI, TenderSearch, and us. The answers will tell you the layer.

Book a call

Bring the last tender you regretted.

In 30 minutes we’ll show you the call selrob would have made, and the working behind it.